Saturday, 23 April 2016


I have shot with just about every popular camera model on the market from cell phones all the way up to $10,000 DSLR cameras and lenses, but I checked my Lightroom stats this week and found that 38% of my photos taken in the last year were taken with the iPhone iSight camera.  I don’t use my iPhone camera for serious photography work most of the time, but I trust it to document my children’s lives, to capture the moments that would otherwise be missed when my other camera is locked up in a Pelican case, and to give me the sharing capabilities that only a cell phone can provide.
I take my cell phone photography very  seriously.

In fact, I’ve had September 9 blocked off on my calendar since the announcements went out, and I watched Tim Cook announce the phone as I sat in my bean bag watching on my Apple TV with a bowl of popcorn.  It’s like the Superbowl, but nobody “accidentally” rips off their shirt, and there aren’t any cool commercials.  I digress.
Apple Iphone 6, 

Over the last few days I have shot thousands and thousands of frames with iPhone 5s and iPhone 6 Plus to compare the cameras.  I took them into the testing lab and did all the scientific testing using a high-end Imatest system with charts and graphs and numbers, and also took them out in the real world to shoot landscapes, portraits, and action.

In all, I ran the cameras through more than 21 different tests.  I put this thing through the wringer!

If you don’t feel like reading a 3,000 word review of the camera in the iPhone 6 Plus and just want to have something to say at the water cooler, then here you go.

The iPhone 6 Plus camera has two significant improvements: improved focus and optical image stabilization (the 6 only has digital image stabilization).  The focus was better than I expected and I was rarely able to trick it into missing focus even when I pushed it hard in a very dark testing environment.
The image stabilization provides a nice improvement in sharpness in low light, but Apple used it in a very smart way to also reduce the noise in the photo (slower shutter speed and capping the max ISO lower).  This produced much better images in very dim environments.

However, it’s not all roses and balloons.  For some reason that I cannot understand, Apple has changed the JPG processing engine and dramatically reduced the contrast in the photos.  This produces blotchy, ugly skin tones and dull, lifeless landscapes.  It’s not a subtle difference at all.
I also picked up on a number of bugs in the system.  One of which is a dramatically reduced frame rate when shooting in dark or high dynamic range environments.  In fact, despite the faster processor on the iPhone 6 Plus, I found the iPhone 5s could shoot twice as many frames in a given amount of time.

In short, the iPhone 6 Plus improves on two of the most important aspects of the camera quality that give it better results in low light, but at the same time make missteps that hurt contrast and add bugs to the system.

Read More : Apple Iphone 6

No comments:

Post a Comment